Planning Appeal
/ ˈplænɪŋ əˈpiːl /
Also known as: section 78 appeal, householder appeal, written representations appeal
Definition
A planning appeal is a formal challenge to a local planning authority's decision, heard by the Planning Inspectorate on behalf of the Secretary of State. Grounds for appeal include: refusal of planning permission; unacceptable conditions; non-determination within the statutory period; or an enforcement notice. Appeals are free to submit. Decided by a Planning Inspector via written representations (most householder cases), a hearing, or public inquiry depending on complexity. The inspector's decision is binding. Appeal periods are strict: 12 weeks for householder refusals, 6 months for other refusals, 28 days for enforcement notices. Nationally approximately 35-40% of appeals are allowed, but success depends heavily on whether the refusal reasons are soundly based in planning policy.
In practice
Before submitting an appeal, it is worth carefully reading the reasons for refusal and assessing honestly whether they are well-founded in planning policy. If the planning officer recommended approval but the planning committee refused contrary to officer advice, this is often strong grounds for appeal - inspectors frequently allow appeals in these circumstances, finding that the committee's reasons are not supported by policy. If the officer also recommended refusal on solid policy grounds, the appeal has a lower prospect of success and a revised design addressing the policy concerns may be a more efficient route to permission.
The appeal statement (the appellant's case) should engage directly and specifically with each reason for refusal, citing the relevant development plan policies and national policy, and explaining why the development complies with them or why the authority's interpretation is incorrect. Generic statements that the development is well-designed or that neighbours support it are less persuasive than focused policy arguments. Professional planning consultants and planning barristers can significantly improve the quality and persuasiveness of appeal statements for complex or high-value cases.